Jump to content

CyberJoly Drim

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Antonina Liedtke)

"CyberJoly Drim" is a cyberpunk short story by Polish author Antonina Liedtke [pl]. In the story, the heroine abandons her body in favour of a digital existence. The story was first published on her personal website in 1998. It was then published in Fenix magazine in 1999.

The story won the most prestigious Polish award for science fiction and fantasy stories (the Janusz A. Zajdel Award), but was negatively reviewed by several writers connected with the leading Polish science fiction and fantasy magazine, Nowa Fantastyka, which had rejected the story before it was submitted to Fenix. Critics argued that it had no literary merit and criticized those who nominated it for awards. Fans of the story praised its depiction of Internet culture, situating its criticism as a reaction to Internet culture and the story's author, who was an outsider to the closed, male world of SF literary fandom.

Plot

[edit]

Jola (CyberJoly) is a computer graphic designer working on the Internet. She doesn't like her real life. Her husband bores her, her physical needs are unimportant. She finds fulfilment in cyberspace. There, she becomes fascinated by a person with the nickname Carramba. Longing for him, she sends a humorous letter-song to a romantic website, which unexpectedly becomes a hit on the charts. Then she creates an animation that became even more popular. She finally meets him and they get married, but her life quickly becomes mundane again. Disappointed with her life, with the help of friends she made online, Jola decides to completely cut off herself from the physical world, donating elements of her body to the bank, keeping only her mind, which is connected to the Internet.

Themes

[edit]

Grażyna Gajewska [pl] analyzed the story from the perspective of feminist literary criticism and the relationship between humans and technology. She focused on the heroine's marginalization of her corporeality and the simultaneous presentation of cyberspace as a space friendly to women.[1][2] Similarly, in 2021, Przemysław Czapliński stated that the heroine's abandonment of her body in favor of an online existence "constituted a form of rebellion against the patriarchal appropriation of the body that dominates in real life".[3]

In 2004, Wojciech Orliński wrote positively about the story in Gazeta Wyborcza, writing that the story "brilliantly reflects" the problem of how for some people the "virtual" world is more interesting than the "real" one.[4]

Awards

[edit]

It won the Janusz A. Zajdel Award for best short story in 2000.[5] It also won the Srebrny Glob [pl] ("Silver Globe") award[6] and the On-line Award by Fahrenheit magazine.[7]

Nowa Fantastyka controversy

[edit]

Before being published by Fenix, it was rejected by Maciej Parowski, editor-in-chief of Nowa Fantastyka, the leading Polish science fiction and fantasy magazine.[8] After the story won prominent literary awards, Nowa Fantastyka published a section, "Critics about CyberJoly Drim", in the January 2001 issue. Three reviews appeared there - by Jacek Dukaj, Marek Oramus and Parowski.[2]

Parowski wrote that "[the text] was captivating in its linguistic and situational consistency in presenting the world of internet culture". However, he criticized its excessive length, "its mental monomania and action-oriented triviality". He considered the awarding of the Zajdel Prize to the story as the result of "promotion by a certain group" (internet users and young authors), saying that the text met the "mythological and sociological needs of a very large group of internet users".[2][9][10]

Dukaj, who himself voted for the story to receive the Silver Globe award, considers it a "good, the best of those printed in 1999, [...] and important" text, if not outstanding. According to the writer, the author successfully combined the thread of a "banal love story" with "internet-related details," creating a realistic story in the cyberpunk genre, which he sees as "a pioneering work in Polish SF." He criticized Parowski for neither understanding nor appreciating the culture of the Internet, and for "failing to see the values in the text that most readers and writers have seen, despite being pointed out to him."[11]

Oramus's response was considered the most critical.[2] Oramus admitted that neither he nor Parowski "feel connected to the Internet subculture from which the story originates". He described the story as banal and devoid of literary value ("Lietke's sentences hit the reader on the head like flails, like mauls, it is difficult to finish them in their tedious manner, because boredom is everywhere..."); he also assessed the story as insufficiently fantastic and criticized members of the Polish fandom who voted for the story to receive awards as not having good enough taste.[12]

The reviews in Nowa Fantastyka were controversial with fans. Oramus's review was criticized in depth in the fanzine Esensja [pl] by Konrad Wagrowski, who found it poorly argued and offensive, especially to younger science fiction fans.[13] The April issue of Nowa Fantastyka printed six letters to the editor about "Critics about CyberJoly Drim", four of which defended the story and one of which criticized it.[14]

Reception

[edit]

Critics of the story found it to be "literarily mediocre" and undeserving of its awards;[15] its prior publication on the Internet and its use of Internet slang were seen as dated and gimmicky.[16] Liedtke was widely seen as an outsider to the SF scene, such as in a review by Andrzej Zimniak.[15] Fans of the story countered that it had been misunderstood by critics who were not interested in Internet culture.[13] Maria Głowacka, writing in 2013 for "Wielogłos [pl]", concluded that the controversy and criticism were related to the fact that the author was a woman from the Internet community, while the negative opinions about the text in industry magazines were made "exclusively by male writers-critics", which, according to her, indicates the "closet nature of the Polish science fiction industry".[2] Regarding the charge that the story was insufficiently SF, Michał Cetnarowski [pl] wrote that thanks to elements such as "implants, cyberspaces and virtual realities" the story "passes the "full-fledged cyberpunk" test without any problems".[17]

In 2022, Stanisław Krawczyk located the rejection of the story by Parowski and Oramus in a dispute that was going on at the time between them (primarily Parowski) and a group of fans and critics from the Polish science fiction and fantasy fandom, whom Parowski labelled "fans of entertainment fantasy".[18] At around the same time, Parowski himself, in his autobiographical book on the history of that community, mentioned Liedtke's story in the context of his "unwise war on fandom" and admitted that he "missed the real change in audience tastes".[19]

Author

[edit]

Liedtke is a graduate of librarianship and information science from the University of Warsaw and worked in the library and publishing house of Warsaw University of Technology, and then in the Publishing School of Economics. C. 2010 she was a New Media Director in the publishing house Runa [pl].[20] She wrote another short story, Psychika ofiary (Psychic of the victim), published in fanzine Framzeta [pl] in 2000.[21]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Grażyna Gajewska (2010). Arcy-nie-ludzkie: przez science fiction do antropologii cyborgów. Poznań: Wydawn. Nauk. UAM. ISBN 978-83-232-2141-8. OCLC 702678826. Retrieved 2024-07-19. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |opis= ignored (help)
  2. ^ a b c d e Maria Głowacka (2013). "Wstęp do teorii trzech kręgów kobiecej prozy science fiction w Polsce. Na przykładzie twórczości Antoniny Liedtke i Anny Kańtoch". Wielogłos (in Polish). 4 (18): 122–125. ISSN 1897-1962. Retrieved 2024-07-19.
  3. ^ Przemysław Czapliński (2021). "Zaplątani w bunt". Teksty Drugie (in Polish) (6): 7–15. ISSN 0867-0633. Retrieved 2024-07-19.
  4. ^ Wojciech Orliński (12 April 2004). "Nomadzi cyberprzestrzeni, Sinha, Indra". wyborcza.pl. Retrieved 2024-07-19.
  5. ^ "Laureaci Nagrody Zajdla". zajdel.art.pl. Archived from the original on 2006-07-15. Retrieved 2016-04-25.
  6. ^ "Srebrny Glob". Retrieved 2016-04-25.
  7. ^ "Nagroda On-Line". Fahrenheit. 1999. Retrieved 2020-08-17.
  8. ^ Jacek Dukaj (2001). "Sny następnego pokolenia". Nowa Fantastyka (1): 72. Archived from the original on 2010-03-17. Retrieved 2024-07-16.
  9. ^ Maciej Parowski (2001). "Gusta i marketing". Nowa Fantastyka (1): 73.
  10. ^ Parowski, Maciej (2011). Małpy Pana Boga. Słowa. Narodowe Centrum Kultury. p. 485-486. ISBN 978-83-61587-72-9.
  11. ^ Jacek Dukaj (2001). "Sny następnego pokolenia". Nowa Fantastyka (1): 72. Archived from the original on 2010-03-17. Retrieved 2024-07-16.
  12. ^ Marek Oramus (2001). "Teoremat Lema". Nowa Fantastyka (1): 72-73.
  13. ^ a b Konrad Wągrowski (15 February 2001). "Esensja: 'Fantastyczne podróże: Problemy panów O.'". Esensja.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 2024-07-19.
  14. ^ Górska Danka: Nowa Fantastyka 2001 nr 4 s. 2 (list do red....); Jezierski Łukasz: Nowa Fantastyka 2001 nr 4 s. 2 (list do red....); Tojza Radosław J.M.: Nowa Fantastyka 2001 nr 4 s. 2 (list do red....); Krawczyk Krzysztof P.: Nowa Fantastyka 2001 nr 4 s. 2 (list do red....); Mariusz Przybysz Nowa Fantastyka 2001 nr 4 s. 2 (list do red....); ; Olszański Tadeusz A.: Nowa Fantastyka 2001 nr 4 s. 2 (list do red....)
  15. ^ a b Andrzej Zimniak (2008). "Nagrody i plebiscyty". Nowa Fantastyka (2): 75.
  16. ^ Krzysztof Głuch (2011). "Recenzje [Dajcie spokój z tym realizmem]" (PDF). Czas Kultury (in Polish). XXVII (3): 144–170. ISSN 0867-2148. Retrieved 2024-07-19.
  17. ^ Michał Cetnarowski (30 January 2020). "Unitry, golemy i karbonada, czyli cyberpunk znad Wisły". culture.pl.
  18. ^ Stanisław Krawczyk (2022-10-11). Gust i prestiż. O przemianach polskiego świata fantastyki (in Polish). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar. p. 149-150. ISBN 978-83-66849-57-0. Retrieved 2024-07-19.
  19. ^ Maciej Parowski (2021-08-24). Wasz cyrk, moje małpy. Chronologiczny alfabet moich autorów. Tom 2 (in Polish). Wydawnictwo SQN. p. 268. ISBN 978-83-8129-632-8. Retrieved 2024-07-19.
  20. ^ "Company information". Runa (in Polish). Archived from the original on 16 April 2013. Retrieved 19 June 2010.
  21. ^ "Framzeta 8 (2000)". Katalog.Czasopism.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 2024-08-03.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CyberJoly_Drim&oldid=1238847627"