Jump to content

Talk:Oasis (band)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleOasis (band) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 23, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
July 26, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 19, 2007WikiProject peer reviewCollaborated
February 3, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
March 9, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Reunion? False

[edit]

The band has a super low probability of reuniting. I HIGHLY doubt that they’d actually come back in 2 years’ time 2603:8001:2E07:2D00:1542:78A1:1792:2502 (talk) 22:08, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you were saying? 2A00:23EE:2010:A9D3:53F:2948:5418:BE22 (talk) 23:55, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lmfao XD Umbre04 (talk) 02:07, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure about that lol Warriorsandcavaliers2015 (talk) 08:00, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oasis' worldwide sales records

[edit]

Is it true that Oasis has sold over 90 million records worldwide? If so, then Oasis should be added to the list of best-selling music artists worldwide. 2601:407:4181:4260:8C55:D86C:6B6E:B6CE (talk) 00:39, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since Oasis selling over 90 million records worldwide was proven wrong, what about Oasis selling over 70 or 75 million records worldwide, as said by two different sources? I think people who look at this article (like me) are very confused about this. Does anyone know how to erase this confusion over this issue? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:407:4181:4260:810F:EF24:92C8:AAA6 (talk) 01:56, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already a band called Oasis before them

[edit]

Was there any legal situation about them using the name, with Peter Skellern already having a band called Oasis? Middle More Rider (talk) 02:34, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt it, not least because nobody remembers Skellern's Oasis. To my understanding there's no actual law to stop two bands having the same name - it just comes down to whether the name's original owners want to sue - and even if they do there's no guarantee that they'll succeed (see for example the Blue vs Blue court case). Mark and inwardly digest (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Oasis reunion announcement (27/08/24)

[edit]

Should we mention this in the wiki? or just wait until its announced?Umbre04 (talk) 02:06, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just wait until it's announced. This isn't a news site. Anwegmann (talk) 12:34, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like we have a date now... -89.245.22.1 (talk) 18:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great. We can add content about a reunion if it is officially announced on that day. This changes nothing. Anwegmann (talk) 18:46, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 August 2024

[edit]

Can you add a year’s active section for 2024 - present Please. Thank you 46.69.114.84 (talk) 17:22, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, because the band has not officially announced that they are reforming. This is, indeed, why the page has protection. Anwegmann (talk) 17:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox genres

[edit]

@TheOnlyOne12: How are these genre changes not necessary? I added genres that are supported by reliable sources but I guess five is too many. Maybe we should go with four. I suggest cutting indie rock and just going with Britpop, alternative rock, pop rock, and neo-psychedelia. Bowling is life (talk) 22:24, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oasis Reunion Lineup

[edit]

I notice Bonehead keeps getting readded to the official member section despite the fact there's no official conformation on this and just speculation in the press, we never updated the Oasis page to say they were back together before it was officially confirmed, so why are we doing it with Bonehead? And if he's being added back to the official members section, then why isn't Gem as what's the difference other than Bonehead being specifically named in the press? Should we agree to keep it as just the Gallagher's until it's been officially confirmed by the band what the line up is? Edandoucho (talk) 09:24, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes, the official lineup should be listed at just the brothers until there is any announcement otherwise, I removed Bonehead and Gem from the official members timeline as they were in the touring members timeline (which matches up with what is known so far. TriPiece (talk) 10:50, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]