Talk:Beckmann rearrangement
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Diagram Error
[edit]The first mechanism diagram has a minor error. The carbon 1 of the oxime starts off as a secondary carbon but switches to being a primary carbon in the 3rd step and remains a primary carbon until the end. I believe one of the 2 methyl groups attacheh to the primary carbon in the first 2 steps should really have been a hydrogen atom (which was indicated in the later steps).
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.32.146.81 (talk) 19:37, 25 January 2007 (UTC). Sorry for not printing an e at the end of lactame!
Stone
Additionally the reagent should be NH2OH not NHOH2 as shown on the page, but it is correct when you click on the graphic - not sure how to fix this,
Jay —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jfitzger (talk • contribs) 23:23, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- replaced top image , now with correct reagents V8rik (talk) 21:26, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Numbering references
[edit]In my view Wiki has a problem numbering references.
- you cannot use reference twice: the count continues regardless
- including a url link will mess up numbering
- get the right order for the references is a nuisance
Solution: not have numbers at all in reference list. V8rik 22:20, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- You're right. Wikipedia has a rather poor mechanism for numbering references. However, without numbers it's not clear which citation goes with which reference. ~K 01:26, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
- V8rik, Go to Wikipedia:Footnotes. They added a bunch of explaination since I went there last. It seems much more helpful. ~K 03:32, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Ref
[edit]- A. H. Blatt (1932). "The Beckmann Rearrangement". Chemical Reviews. 12 (2): 215–260. doi:10.1021/cr60042a002.-Stone (talk) 07:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
The ref for ref 11 should be: F. W. Semmler, Berichte der Dtsch. Chem. Gesellschaft 1892, 25, 3352–3354 DOI: 10.1002/cber.189202502200
Copyright problem removed
[edit] Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.adichemistry.com/organic/namedreactions/beckmann/beckmann-rearrangement-1.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 10:52, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Beckmann rearrangement page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Beckmann rearrangement" page.