Jump to content

Talk:Batik

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBatik has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 17, 2014Good article nomineeNot listed
May 1, 2014Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are listed below:

  • There are numerous uncited statements throughout the article.
  • The lead, at five paragraphs, is longer than the recommended number listed at WP:LEADLENGTH.
    • Fixed.
  • There is a gallery section, even though Wikiped is not a gallery (WP:NOTGALLERY)
    • Removed.
  • The "Batik museums" section contains promotional information, including when museums are open.
    • Opening times are plain facts, not promotion, though whether we should be listing such details in a textile article is more doubtful; removed per WP:NOTCATALOG. We could in fact remove the whole thing to a separate list: List of batik museums if folks feel the business of museums is close to off-topic for this article.

Is anyone interested in fixing up this article, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 17:29, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would have been, as the GA nom a decade ago, had I been informed ... Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:48, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result pending

This article has uncited statements throughout the article, including entire paragraphs, and "citation needed" tags from Jan. 2024. There's also "better source needed" tags from 2021 that need to be resolved in order to maintain its GA status. Z1720 (talk) 00:21, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]