Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains

The Trains WikiProject
General information
Main project page	(WP:TWP)	talk
Portal	(P:Trains)	talk
Project navigation bar		talk
Project participants		talk
Project banner (doc)	{{TWP}}	talk
Project category		talk
Manual of style	(WP:TWP/MOS)	talk
Welcome message		talk
Departments
Assessments	(WP:TWP/A)	talk
Peer review	(WP:TWP/PR)	talk
To do list		talk
Daily new article search	search criteria	talk
Task forces
Article maintenance		talk
Assessment backlog elim. drive		talk
By country series		talk
Categories		talk
Images		talk
Locomotives		talk
Maps		talk
Rail transport in Germany		talk
Monorails		talk
Operations		talk
Passenger trains		talk
Portal		talk
Rail transport modelling		talk
Timelines		talk

Requested move at Talk:Midland Mainline#Requested move 9 August 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Midland Mainline#Requested move 9 August 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. JuniperChill (talk) 19:29, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Train Stop Priority

Hi all, I am currently looking into an extension of the Altamont corridor express and Amtrak San Joaquins as part of a rail agreement. I wanted to know, at a point where both trains have service, do I put the Altamont Corridor as the template style for the page here on wikipedia, or do I use the Amtrak template style? Cloudsarepretty (talk) 16:21, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Who owns the station? Trainsandotherthings (talk) 18:01, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

There's no hard-and-fast rule. Generally it comes down to whatever the most visible presence at the station is: whether one style of signage is used, who owns the station, whether one system runs by far the most trains, etc. It's also fine to omit the style parameter entirely. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:48, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Rewrite of JGR Class 150 from ja:国鉄150形蒸気機関車 on Japanese Wikipedia

(I understand this is better suited to Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains in Japan, where I have also posted this, but that project has recently been marked as Inactive, and I'm not sure that I will find anyone to help there.)

I have just finished rewriting the locomotive article JGR Class 150 almost completely, basing the rewrite on a translation of the Japanese version ja:国鉄150形蒸気機関車, including its list of sources cited. However, I have made many further edits for style and content, including rearranging some portions of text, and I also omitted a few parts of the Japanese version (mostly concerning appearances in modern media) as probably not wanted on the English Wikipedia.

I am still pretty sure about the basic correctness of the results, but I really want people to look this over, particularly people knowledgeable of Japanese railways and people fluent in both Japanese and English. My Japanese ability is, in my own judgment, non-existent; while I have learned some features of the language on my own, and I do know bits of vocabulary, I've never been anywhere near Japan and I'm pretty sure that I couldn't so much as read a road sign or ask a cop for help on my own. I'm utterly dependant on machine tools like Google Translate (carefully applied and checked — I'm well aware that it can't be simply trusted as is!), the "10ten" dictionary-lookup browser plugin (an invaluable aid), and Google Lens (for OCR-reading graphical Japanese text) to do something like this.

Unfortunately, the original Japanese article does not have inline citations of its sources, and none of those sources are online anyway (they're rather old and Japanese-only), so I haven't been able to check them directly. Colin Douglas Howell (talk) 08:22, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

@Colin Douglas Howell, does this article still need checking? ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Yes, please! I haven't done anything new with it since I posted that message, but it doesn't look like anyone else has really looked at it either. Colin Douglas Howell (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

New source needed for BART annual ridership and List of United States rapid transit systems page

The source for the 2023 BART annual ridership and the entire source for List of United States rapid transit systems now leads to a 404. Needs a new source. I will try to go on Wayback machine, but please help me find a current source. Maybe from BART's own website? Alexysun (talk) 17:20, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Line colors

Does anyone know how to change the line colors on the diagram maps? Template:Greenbush Line is very confusing to read, because the MBTA Red Line is shown in blue, and the commuter rail line is shown in red. (The normal system map color for MBTA Commuter Rail is a dark purple.) -- Beland (talk) 05:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

The convention for RDTs is that red is for heavy rail and blue is for light rail. It is possible to use other colours, but there needs to be a consensus established to change the diagram first. Mjroots (talk) 07:25, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Where would be a good place to discuss the question and move toward consensus? I'm unsure if you mean there should be a consensus for this specific article, for all MBTA lines, or for systems that color-name or color-code their lines in general. -- Beland (talk) 17:27, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Well, what about Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Greater Boston Public Transit? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

That project is marked as semi-active and it looks like only one human has posted there in the past 7 years or so. I've posted a link to this thread there anyway. How would we go about changing this for MBTA lines, assuming no one objects? -- Beland (talk) 06:02, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

@Beland: I don't oppose such a change, but I'm not optimistic about it being worth the effort. If there is a consensus to change, then all the icons would need to be swapped into the desired color palette. If any of the correct color icons don't exist, then those would need to be uploaded (and any future modifications to the RDTs may require that as well.) It would only make sense to do if all of the relevant templates in Category:Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority line templates were converted - having a single RDT with a different scheme would not make sense. My off-the-cuff guess would be somewhere in the 40-80 hour range for a moderately skilled editor to do it all. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

@Beland: These are all of the different icons used in Template:Greenbush Line, including Template:MBTA South Station Quincy rail approach which forms the upper two-thirds of the diagram. They are divided into groups accordint to whether you can use them unchanged, whether you need to change some of the coloured portions, or all of them.

• Spacers (no need for change)

   (c)  (d)  (o)

• Icons where none of the colours may be changed:

   (lACC)  (lhdSTRae+L)  (lv-ACC)  (lvINTACC)  (POINTER4)

• Red set, where part of the icon should not be changed:

   (d-KRZ2+4u)  (HSTACC)  (KACCxe)  (KINTACCa)

• Blue set, where part of the icon should not be changed:

   (uACC)  (udACC)  (utdACC)  (utINT2+4)

• Mixed set, where part of the icon should not be changed:

   (mvÜWBr)

• Red set, where all of the colours may be changed:

   (ABZg+l)  (ABZgr)  (ABZgr+xr)  (cSTRq)  (CONTfq)  (CONTgq)  (dCONTfq)  (dCONTgq)  (dSHI3+l)  (dSTR)  (dSTR~R)  (dYRDa)  (exCONTf@F)  (exSTR+r)  (SHI1+l)  (SHI3gr)  (STR~L)  (STR~R)  (v-SHI2r)  (v-STR)  (v-STRr)

• Blue set, where all of the colours may be changed:

   (uCONT3+g)  (udCONTgq)  (udSHI2g+l)  (udSTR+4)  (udSTRc1)  (udSTRc3)  (udYRDe)  (uSTR)  (uSTRr)  (utCONT2)  (utdSTR)  (utdSTR3+1-)  (utSTR+4)  (utSTRc1)  (utSTRc2)  (utSTRc3)  (utSTRc4)  (utv-STR3)  (uv-SHI2r)  (uvABZg2-)

• Mixed set, where all of the colours may be changed:

   (mvSTR)  (umtdKRZ)  (umvSTR)

For all of the blue icons, a red equivalent exists and this is produced by removing the initial "u":  (uCONT3+g) →  (CONT3+g)

For most of the red icons, a blue equivalent exists and this is normally produced by adding an initial "u":  (ABZg+l) →  (uABZg+l)

But to produce other colours, you add a suffix:  (ABZg+l black)  (ABZg+l orange)  (ABZg+l yellow)  (ABZg+l green)  (ABZg+l violet) - see c:Category:BSicon/railway/other colors for a list

Not all alternative colours have a full icon set. Consider the red set, some of the matching icons in the green set are missing:  (ABZg+l green)  (ABZgr green)   (ABZgr+xr green)  (cSTRq green)  (CONTfq green)  (CONTgq green)  (dCONTfq green)  (dCONTgq green)   (dSHI3+l green)  (dSTR green)   (dSTR~R green)   (dYRDa green)   (exCONTf@F green)  (exSTR+r green)   (SHI1+l green)   (SHI3gr green)  (STR~L green)  (STR~R green)  (v-SHI2r green)  (v-STR green)  (v-STRr green)

HTH. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 11:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Hmm, where there are two colors in the same image, the number of needed combination gets a bit excessive. The names for all these icons and how they are put together seems not very editor-friendly, so maybe a better solution would be to come up with a new way to do this.

One way would be to make normal images, either by screenshotting the existing template and editing the colors. Another would be to use a simple table to list the stops and other elements. I like the idea of a simple table because it would cut out some visual clutter, making the diagram more accessible, and it would be easy to edit and easier to keep the links to stations and whatnot. -- Beland (talk) 18:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

RDTs are inherently a very complicated system because railroads (and the other linear features such as waterways and paths that RDTs are used for) are complicated. There are something like 300,000 BSicons currently on Commons, and that necessitates a system of abbreviated file names. That complexity is worth it: it is possible for users to create useful and visually consistent diagrams entirely within a template on Wikipedia. No need to use an external program (unless you're creating new icons), no need for graphic design skills, and every diagram across Wikipedia uses the same visual language.

I don't disagree that a better way to create and edit RDTs would be desirable. A graphic editor that makes it easy to find and choose icons, and get everything properly aligned, would be a great Community Wishlist item. But there's no need to reinvent the wheel, especially by screenshotting RDTs. Many line and service articles already have a station table, such as Greenbush Line#Station listing. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)