Talk:SOM (architectural firm)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SOM (architectural firm) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Added a Women at SOM section
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians, today I started a new section under People about Women at SOM that takes advantage of the great new site Pioneering Women in Architecture and added links and cites wherever possible. The page still has a header that some of the content on this page comes off as promotional. Fothergilla (talk) 17:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the SOM (architectural firm) page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "SOM (architectural firm)" page.
Categories:
- C-Class WikiProject Illinois articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Illinois articles
- C-Class company articles
- Mid-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class Architecture articles
- Mid-importance Architecture articles
- C-Class Chicago articles
- High-importance Chicago articles
- WikiProject Chicago articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class University of Massachusetts articles
- Low-importance University of Massachusetts articles
- WikiProject University of Massachusetts articles
- WikiProject United States articles