Wikipedia:Requests for comment/LIGerasimova
In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute, not different disputes. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 21:16, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 18:13, 28 August 2024 (UTC).
Statement of the dispute
[edit]LIGerasimova is engaged in a continuous and deliberate personal attacks and false accusations on Tabib. She spends most of her time attacking other editors (esp. Tabib) in often crude personal terms and provoking conflicts between users.
Description
[edit]User LIGerasimova suddenly appeared in Wikipedia on Feb 9, 2005 in the midst of hot disputes between Tabib and user Pantherarosa over the content of the Safavids page. From the very first day LIGerasimova distinguished herself by aggressively attacking other editors and accusing them in POV, promotion of "Turkish propaganda" and establishing a "Turkish mafia". Interestingly, user LIGerasimova claimed that she was a neutral third party and came to the discussion after Tabib's call for mediation. However, after viewing LIGerasimova's contribution log it is hardly convincing, which makes one think that she has some hidden intentions. See, Tabib's talkpage for details. Moreover, according to LIGerasimova's contribution log, she spent almost all of her time attacking other editors. Her attacks and insults continued even though other editors largely ignored her attacks and avoided responding to her groundless accusations.
For details see, user Tabib's talkpage and to a lesser degree Safavids talkpage.
- Thanks for twisting facts again, and again (ad nauseam??) Instead of whining into everybody's ears, stic to ethical conduct!--LIGerasimova 12:31, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Since recently, LIGerasimova waged another attack on User:Tabib in Nagorno-Karabakh talkpage. This recent atack demonstrates that LIGerasimova di not give up her/his/ disruptive actions.
Evidence of disputed behavior
[edit](provide diffs and links)
Applicable policies
[edit]Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute
[edit](provide diffs and links)
Users certifying the basis for this dispute
[edit](sign with ~~~~)
- --Tabib 15:49, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
2. --Ulvi I. 23:32, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Other users who endorse this summary
[edit](sign with ~~~~~~~~~~~~)
Response
[edit]This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete.
{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}
Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):
Outside view
[edit]This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute.
{User Luba Ivanovna Gerasimova is well known to me. She is a sincere, resolute and just person, deeply concerned with ethical conduct. As she observed unethical and insincere activities on the part of user Tabib, she confronted him with facts in a clear but correct manner. She was met with vile language by user Tabib in return, did however not respond in the same manner. It is ridiculous to describe her as a "vandal" just because she points a finger on slezy business going on (User Tabib trying to rigg opinion with the help of user Deli Eshek, as documented on the latter's talk page. User Tabib hastened to eradicate traces of his foul play, was immediately caught by MS. Gerasimova, whom he showered with abuse again). Please refer to the contribution logs of User Tabib and Ms. Gerasimova}
Kiramtu Kunettabib 19:36, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- For purposes of clarity, pls, see my reply here--Tabib 20:34, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]All signed comments and talk not related to a vote or endorsement, should be directed to this page's discussion page.